Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<BAY14-F1784BC294209D40BB32F16D0F90@phx.gbl>
X-Originating-Email:	[lukeh-temp-email AT hotmail DOT com]
X-Sender:	lukeh-temp-email AT hotmail DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<20050604171410.GA32605@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
From:	"Luke Hutchinson" <lukeh-temp-email AT hotmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: lrint() incorrect results.
Date:	Sun, 05 Jun 2005 03:27:01 +1000
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Is there any particular reason the same inline functions as defined in the 
MinGW header files are not used?  They work correctly, and being inlined, 
are more efficient.

_________________________________________________________________
SEEK: Over 80,000 jobs across all industries at Australia's #1 job site.   
http://ninemsn.seek.com.au?hotmail


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -