Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 25 Aug 2004 16:07:24 -0500
From:	Mike <mikee AT mikee DOT ath DOT cx>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Why umount -A is a really bad idea
Message-ID:	<20040825210724.GG29527@mikee.ath.cx>
References:	<412CFBCB DOT 3040808 AT breame DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<412CFBCB.3040808@breame.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i
Organization:	The Math Forum
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Colin JN Breame wrote:

> I tried this once, just to see what would happen.  I then spent the next 
> hour restoring the mount points.  I've learnt a valuable lesson...

Why would a 'mount -a' not work after your 'umount -a' to restore the mounts?

Mike

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -