Mail Archives: cygwin/2004/07/15/16:23:33
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 04:13:16PM -0400, Larry Hall wrote:
>At 01:52 PM 7/15/2004, you wrote:
>>From: "Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS)"
>>> gcc uses the complex math functions from the system libraries,
>>> (excluding builtins). They aren't in newlib, so cygwin doesn't have them.
>>>
>>> I, too, would like them as they are required by gfortran, which will be
>>> (is) the fortran compiler in gcc-3.5.
>>
>>UPDATE: This just in...
>>
>>http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.4.1/gcc/Other-Builtins.html#Other%20Builtins
>>
>>"The ISO C99 functions ... cabsf, cabsl, cabs, cacosf, cacoshf, cacoshl,
>>cacosh, cacosl, cacos, cargf, cargl, carg, casinf, casinhf, casinhl,
>>casinh, casinl, casin, catanf, catanhf, catanhl, catanh, catanl, catan,
>>cbrtf, cbrtl, cbrt, ccosf, ccoshf, ccoshl, ccosh, ccosl, ccos, cexpf,
>>cexpl, cexp, cimagf, cimagl, cimag, conjf, conjl, conj,..., cpowf,
>>cpowl, cpow, cprojf, cprojl, cproj, crealf, creall, creal, csinf, csinhf,
>>csinhl, csinh, csinl, csin, csqrtf, csqrtl, csqrt, ctanf, ctanhf, ctanhl,
>>ctanh, ctanl, ctan ... are handled as built-in functions except in strict
>>ISO C90 mode (-ansi or -std=c89)."
>>
>>Sounds like I just need to wait for gcc 3.4. Is there a build of it
>>available for cygwin yet?
>
>No. Gerrit said maybe sometime in August.
Can we get August moved up to next week, maybe? Back in B20 days, we'd
August the complex numbers all of the time so that they would be
available ASAP.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -