Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:49:03 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: PCYMTNQREAIYR Please Configure Your Mailer To Not Quote Raw E-mail Addresses In Your Replies.
Message-ID:	<20040712154903.GA9940@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20040712055642 DOT 99987 DOT qmail AT web52209 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0407120922280 DOT 11227 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <20040712150848 DOT GB9325 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0407121126550 DOT 11227 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.58.0407121126550.11227@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i
Note-from-DJ:	This may be spam

On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 11:36:41AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 09:32:03AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> >On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Elvin Peterson wrote:
>> >
>> >> --- Larry Hall wrote:
>> >> > Lots of email clients do this automatically.
>> >>
>> >> This should be done server side, by the mailing list
>> >> manager.  If you subscribe to any of the sourceforge
>> >> lists, you will know that they do this automatically.
>> >> Much better than requesting each person to do it
>> >> everytime (something always gets through and then it
>> >> is spam city).
>> >
>> >Elvin,
>> >
>> >This wasn't an arbitrary decision.  Both ways have been tried, and, in
>> >general, it was not possible to reliably munge e-mail addresses (and
>> >*only* e-mail addresses) in the archived messages.  This garbled the
>> >message contents, and so was turned off.  The headers are still munged...
>>
>> I still have it on my back burner to do some kind of intelligent munging
>> of email.  I wrote a sample filter that sort of worked but it needed more
>> intelligence to be really useful.
>>
>> Unfortunately real life has been stomping hard on me in the last few months
>> so I haven't gotten around to doing this.  I would love to not have to
>> keep telling people not to quote raw email addresses, though.
>>
>> cgf
>
>Great.  Lacking the information, I didn't want to make any statements
>about your degree of interest in this, but in light of the above my
>earlier sentense should probably say
>
>"...the list maintainers will be grateful for any help in doing this, and
>will probably want to try out suitably tested filters..."
>
>If anyone volunteers to help, I'm assuming you'd be willing to provide the
>sample filter as a basis, as well as the information on where to send
>patches, etc.

While the free software, collaborative philsophy is usually a good thing,
this really requires a few concentrated hours from me to hack on the
sourceware spam filters.  I wouldn't want to have someone else learn
its intricacies.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -