www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Message-ID: | <20040712061253.4864.qmail@web52209.mail.yahoo.com> |
Date: | Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:12:53 -0700 (PDT) |
From: | Elvin Peterson <elvin_peterson AT yahoo DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: Options for Source Code Control: RCS v. SCCS v. CVS |
To: | cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
In-Reply-To: | <1089497048.3029.88.camel@localhost> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
--- Robert Collins wrote: > On Sun, 2004-07-11 at 03:09, Richard Heintze wrote: > > I need some help understanding how RCS works. I > typed > > "info RCS" and felt confused. > > Not surprisingly. RCS doesn't model what any modern > revision control > system does. He should've used "man rcsintro", which would've given a simple explanation. > Really, one doesn't. One chooses between anything > other than CVS or RCS. > RCS is not suitable for programming projects, as > each file is versioned > separately, the same goes for CVS. You can always tag the releases for the package. Most of the "modern" version control systems are so arcane that almost all the organizations using them have a dedicated engineer to manage it. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |