Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Dave Korn" <dk AT artimi DOT com>
To:	"'Cygwin List'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Thousands' grouping flag in printf() format string
Date:	Mon, 7 Jun 2004 14:51:05 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<6.1.0.6.0.20040605005926.03244668@pop.theworld.com>
Message-ID:	<NUTMEGPDVniSnRMWuLn000001f8@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	07 Jun 2004 13:51:05.0968 (UTC) FILETIME=[7AA55F00:01C44C96]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Larry Hall
> Sent: 05 June 2004 06:01
> To: Laszlo Ersek; cygwin

> At 02:18 PM 6/4/2004, you wrote:
> >I'd like to ask whether there is any intention to implement 
> the X/Open
> >extension ' (0x27) printf() format flag. (Numbered argument 
> specifications
> >work (thanks to Jeff Johnston), and they are an X/Open 
> extension too.)

> The target for Cygwin is POSIX.  That said, if someone were 
> to submit a
> patch to support the construct you're looking for, I'm sure 
> it would be
> thoughtfully considered (i.e. PTC ;-) )


  I thought we (TINW) use the newlib implementation of printf, don't we?  So
this topic should really be redirected to the appropriate newlib list.

  (Where they'll probably say PTC anyway!)


    cheers, 
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -