Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Dave Korn" <dk AT artimi DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: mailx mail replacement - solution in shell script
Date:	Tue, 11 May 2004 10:10:18 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<slrn.pl.ca04f8.1ld.jerzy@solveig.jedwab>
Message-ID:	<NUTMEGOeIiGXix4A2Dr0000006a@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	11 May 2004 09:10:19.0022 (UTC) FILETIME=[C7EE2AE0:01C43737]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of jerzy szczudlowski
> Sent: 11 May 2004 00:36

> Yes, it relies on MTA (and I thought that ssmtp is good default for
> Cygwin) since original mailx does the same. Althought one could simply
> use netcat, but that brakes SMTP protocol and this behaviour 
> is recently  becoming forbidden.

  I'm curious: in what way does using netcat break the smtp protocol?  


    cheers, 
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -