www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | "Dave Korn" <dk AT artimi DOT com> |
To: | <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Subject: | RE: CVS b0rked? |
Date: | Thu, 15 Jan 2004 18:18:16 -0000 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <Pine.GSO.4.58.0401151141220.23399@eos> |
Message-ID: | <NUTMEGPZJO3vg8lvJFs00000135@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM> |
X-OriginalArrivalTime: | 15 Jan 2004 18:18:16.0843 (UTC) FILETIME=[F24EC5B0:01C3DB93] |
Note-from-DJ: | This may be spam |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Brian Ford [mailto:spamspamspam AT eggchipsandspam] > Sent: 15 January 2004 17:50 > To: Dave Korn > Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Subject: RE: CVS b0rked? > Please don't include plain text email addresses in the body > of messages. > They are food for spam harvesters. I imagine this was just > an oversight as I think I have seen you remove them before? Oops, yes indeed. Sorry. It happened because I replied to the copy you sent me directly instead of to the copy which came via the listserv with the redacted headers. So I quoted an addy, but then again you've been Cc'ing posters as well as sending to the list. Chalk us up one minor breach of list etiquette each! > > > [snip] > > > > FAIL: pthread/cancel11.c (execute) > > > > > > > I don't see this one on NT4. > > > > > I repeated 'make check', and it repeated. > There should be no reason to rebuild under a different Cygwin > DLL version. Agreed, unless by some terrible coincidence there's a bug in the snapshot version that impacts on the compiler in some subtle way. However that's a pretty unlikely possibility I agree. > However, if you did not do a clean build as I suggested after > CGF fixed the CVS tree, I would again recommend it. Yeh, I just completely rm my obj and install dirs every time. > You could try to debug it :). Ya never know, I might just do that. Is it worth rebuilding with --enable-debugging at configure time ? I dunno how much worthwhile that will actually give me.... DaveK -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |