Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 22 Dec 2003 16:59:56 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Unable to compile cygwin
Message-ID:	<20031222215956.GB32638@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<BAY9-F16kERMwSuWPjm00018ce5 AT hotmail DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<BAY9-F16kERMwSuWPjm00018ce5@hotmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 09:54:43PM +0000, Arash Partow wrote:
>proving a negative is much harder than proving a positive...

Yeah.  You're right.  It's better to just assume it's gloriously
trustworthy if it's free software and maliciously bad if it comes from
Microsoft.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -