Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Jim Ramsay <i DOT am AT jimramsay DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Unable to compile cygwin
Date:	Mon, 22 Dec 2003 12:10:01 -0600
Lines:	19
Message-ID:	<bs7c1p$ob0$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:	<BCELLMLNMKLBEEMIBLGDEEOOCHAA DOT gabriel DOT soubies AT thales-is DOT com> <20031222164832 DOT GC2545 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4
In-Reply-To:	<20031222164832.GC2545@redhat.com>

Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 03:29:25PM +0100, Gabriel SOUBIES wrote:
> 
>>I've been using Cygwin for a while and am really happy with it.
>>But recently my paranoid boss has asked me to prove him that there was no
>>security problem with using Cygwin on our secure network.
> 
> 
> Cygwin is not secure.  It's a given.  There are surely easy local exploits
> that could be used to break it.

Ha!  Ask that boss to prove to you that there is no security problem 
running Windows on a 'secure' network.

I'd like to see him try to get the source code and recompile THAT!

-- 
Jim Ramsay


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -