Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning:	eos.vss.fsi.com: ford owned process doing -bs
Date:	Thu, 4 Dec 2003 15:40:14 -0600 (CST)
From:	Brian Ford <ford AT vss DOT fsi DOT com>
X-X-Sender:	ford AT eos
To:	"Rajagopalan, Karthik" <Karthik-Rajagopalan AT deshaw DOT com>
cc:	"'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Query regarding Cygwin make/Gnu Make
In-Reply-To:	<21559A0D4CF8D511B51100065B38178B0166FC14@mshyd2.hyd.deshaw.com>
Message-ID:	<Pine.GSO.4.58.0312041533470.28297@eos>
References:	<21559A0D4CF8D511B51100065B38178B0166FC14 AT mshyd2 DOT hyd DOT deshaw DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Rajagopalan, Karthik wrote:

>   I found today a weird working difference between Cygwin Make against Gnu
> Make. Let me explain the situation I faced.
>
Cygwin make *is* GNU make.

> I have following piece of code as "test" target. Here $(EXE) takes .exe for
> Windows and blank for Linux.
>
>  test:
> 	cat test.dat | test$(EXE) 1> test.res 2>&
> 	diff test.res test.std
>
> When "make test" is fired, it proceed to execute the first command
>
> 	cat test.dat | test$(EXE) 1> test.res 2>&
>
I am unfamiliar with the 2>& syntax.  Was that a typo?

> test$(EXE) return -1 back because of encountering a error in code test.c.
> This return value stops the execution of "make" utility in Cygwin to proceed
> to next command
>
That is correct.  (Now officially OT)  From "info make":

   To ignore errors in a command line, write a `-' at the beginning of
the line's text (after the initial tab).  The `-' is discarded before
the command is passed to the shell for execution.

   For example,

     clean:
             -rm -f *.o

This causes `rm' to continue even if it is unable to remove a file.

> 		diff test.res test.std
>
> where in Linux it proceeds to execute the above code. This is the desired
> execution we require to happen. Why is this strange difference in "Cygwin
> Make" and "GNU Make". Which is correct order of execution :Cygwin Make or
> GNU Make". Can you explain me the workingfunctionality behind this taking
> into account the return value to shell?
>
Sounds like a Linux GNU make bug to me.  AFAIK, the return status for a
pipeline is generally that of the last command.

HTH

-- 
Brian Ford
Senior Realtime Software Engineer
VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems
FlightSafety International
Phone: 314-551-8460
Fax:   314-551-8444

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -