| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Edward Peschko wrote: >Like I said, I'm not worried about my specific applications. I want cygwin to transparently and with no fuss - and correctly - build third party APIs, so I can properly link with them (and debug them if necessary). > All I can say is what I've heard many others say, which is... PTC. >>We can speculate from now until forever but until and unless you try it you'll never know for sure. Let us know how you make out... >> >> >I did try it. With berkeleydb. Read my previous post. > Sorry. I didn't read it thoroughly. >>Let us know how your first implementation of this concept goes... >> >> >Is this an OK from the developers of cygwin to do an implementation, with the results of that implementation being merged into cygwin? I don't want to spend a lot of time pursuing it if my results don't have a chance of being merged. > >The last time I asked, the answer was no to this question. > Well I'm no developer *OF* Cygwin so I cannot comment with authority however if what you say would indeed be useful I'm sure that Cygwin people would accept or at least evaluate an implementation that you write. -- I hit the CTRL key but I'm still not in control! -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |