Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane:	http://gmane.org/
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Andrew DeFaria <ADeFaria AT Salira DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Win2k and cygwin memory leak
Date:	Thu, 07 Aug 2003 15:20:50 -0700
Lines:	38
Message-ID:	<bgujb9$kbc$1@main.gmane.org>
References:	<OF496F5AEF DOT 0B2F825C-ON85256D7B DOT 00697D18 AT empirehealthcare DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en, zh
In-Reply-To:	<OF496F5AEF.0B2F825C-ON85256D7B.00697D18@empirehealthcare.com>
Mail-Copies-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Brian DOT Kelly AT empireblue DOT com wrote:

>> Seems like your saying that (using a car analogy) he should replace 
>> the carberator when the real problem is a leak in the fuel line. (IOW 
>> you're attacking the wrong area - your problem lies elsewhere).
>
> Nope - gotta lower your expectations. I use to work in shop when I was 
> in high school. Bascially I'd snip the line at the leak, get a piece 
> of rubber hose and a couple of hose clamps. Back on the road in five 
> minutes!!
>
> - Oh but that's not SAFE ( you may counter )
>
> ( to which I would say ) - neither are crashing servers ...
>
> Assuming of course we stick to your analogy and assume that I can't 
> 'replace' the fuel line because - well - it's "Ford's" problem .....
>
> You see, basic people (clueless) are very practical. Why put in a new 
> engine when a piece of duct tape will do???

You refuse to see the obvious! While in my admittedly simple analogy yes 
you can duct tape it because it's right there and accessable. However in 
this case you do not have access to Microsoft's memory managing code!  
Sure you could re-write it but you'd also have to re-write just about  
all of the Windows OS. Sure this effectively new OS would not have the  
problem anymore. Perhaps you could call this OS something with a cutesy  
name like say LINUX!

Bottom line is Cygwin is nothing more than a very good collection of  
applications, key point here, EMULTATING a Posix like enviornment  
(another key point) ON TOP OF another OS. Cygwin != an OS and is bound  
and limited by the underlying OS. If you have a problem with the  
underlying OS then by all means - you are welcomed to fix it. But alas  
you do not have access to the source code. So what do you have to do?  
Maybe even the clueless can guess this.... YOU HAVE TO GO TO MICROSOFT!  
(Which is, after all, what we've been saying all along)



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -