Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/05/11/15:39:23
Nomen Nescio wrote:
> > >> Who's the sh-utils guru here? :-)
> cgf> That could be you! It's free software, remember?
>
> Cute, very cute, Chris, and yes, we know full well that this
> is a (mostly) all-volunteer effort as far as fixing nits,
> but that was a very non-responsive and unproductive reply,
Well, yours was a very unproductive question.
> and it would be more helpful if you could tell us who deals
> with bumping versions in code inherited from gnu.org.
> (I.E., sh-utils in general and uname in particular.)
>
> At least, can any of you -RCM's tell us who's the most familiar
> with configuration-management issues in that part of the tree?
I suggest you spend some time reading http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
specifically:
MAINTAINERS DO NOT WANT PRIVATE EMAIL.
So, asking for specific contact people just irritates. This list is the
correct destination for any questions. As always, you have exactly 3
choices:
1) Provide a *good* bug report, and wait for someone to volunteer some of
their time to a fix.
2) Fix it yourself.
3) Complain, achieving nothing.
Max.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -