Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/04/16/12:58:34
On Wed, 16 Apr 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 11:56:32AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > Try "strace sh -c ls".
> > Igor
>
> Well... let's get serious. What do you expect? Think UNIX. The
> executable is 'ls'. The directory is 'ls'. This is only possible
> on Windows because the executables have this .exe suffix. On UNIX
> this won't be a problem since there wouldn't be two files with the
> same name in a directory.
>
> Corinna
Yes. But since such a mechanism *was* introduced in Cygwin, shouldn't the
executable take precedence, at least for an exec() call? I can't think of
a situation when anyone would want to exec() a directory...
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty.
-- Leto II
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -