Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 27 Mar 2003 00:50:25 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Possible GPL Violation
Message-ID:	<20030327055025.GB17191@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<02ae01c2f411$92568400$cf6d86d9 AT ellixia> <02b401c2f411$ec92cbe0$cf6d86d9 AT ellixia> <20030327035522 DOT GA16115 AT redhat DOT com> <20030327051747 DOT GA3452 AT world-gov>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20030327051747.GA3452@world-gov>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.1i

On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 11:17:47PM -0600, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
>While I agree, doesn't it make more sense to contact people off-list
>first?  If this was gpl AT gnu DOT org or something I'd understand, but really
>other than us being fellow Cygwin users what does it have to do with
>the cygwin@ list?

Hmm.  Maybe.  It's nice to have some support if/when there are questions
or complaints but maybe you're more apt to have complaints if the
message is somehow perceived as a public remonstration.

Oh well.  I've done the same thing.  Food for thought.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -