Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 5 Mar 2003 15:54:47 +0100 (CET)
From:	Pavel Tsekov <ptsekov AT gmx DOT net>
X-X-Sender:	ptsekov AT moria DOT atlanticsky DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: setup.exe: something besides C++?
In-Reply-To:	<b451gc$gmu$1@main.gmane.org>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.4.44.0303051551180.20182-100000@moria.atlanticsky.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Joe Buehler wrote:

> I don't want to start a huge flamewar, but have any of the setup.exe
> developers thought about changing setup.exe so that it is written
> in something a little easier to work on, like perl/tk?  People have
> been asking for various enhancements for quite a while now, so
> obviously it is not easy to change setup...

But then, it would become _huge_. You'd have to download a bunch of other
software just to install Cygwin.

Btw, it doesn't seem that the problem with implementing features is the 
language being used for development, but the lack of time.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -