www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/02/24/16:03:32

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: james DOT m DOT barker AT boeing DOT com
Subject: mknod implementation? any idea when it will occur?
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 12:58:29 -0800
Message-ID: <OF740BE822.6DFA596C-ON88256CD7.0072DD1B@hughes.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0

I am porting some code from a linux / unix environment that views solid
models thru geomview.  I have the latest cygwin release installed 1.3.20.
My problem is that the mknod function does not exist.  Are there any plans
to implement a working version of mknod and not just the dummy version that
tells me it's not implemented.  I can create some ugly workarounds but I
would prefer not altering the code.  If I knew the mknod function was going
to be implemented in the near future I would avoid going down this nasty
path.

Any info would be appreciated

Jim


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019