www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Message-Id: | <5.2.0.9.2.20030130153913.01e9fe30@pop3.cris.com> |
X-Sender: | rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com |
Date: | Thu, 30 Jan 2003 15:40:32 -0800 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | Randall R Schulz <rrschulz AT cris DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: Hope you can help |
In-Reply-To: | <009c01c2c8b7$09864500$78d96f83@pomello> |
References: | <se395a95 DOT 042 AT gwia DOT unt DOT edu> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
At 15:26 2003-01-30, Max Bowsher wrote: >... > >Persuading things to run truly in the background is quite difficult. If you >can guarantee that the user at the physical console won't log off, you can >probably get away with just running sshd and minimizing it. > >I fled the world of Win9x when XP came out, and haven't looked back. (I >realize that this is not necessarily an option. But there are compelling >reasons to forget about 9x if you are able to do so.) Max, Why did you not move to NT 4 or 2000 Pro? You would not have had to wait nearly as long. Randall Schulz >Max. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |