www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Message-ID: | <3E35BF74.4070009@ece.gatech.edu> |
Date: | Mon, 27 Jan 2003 18:23:32 -0500 |
From: | Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 |
X-Accept-Language: | en-us, en |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | "William A. Hoffman" <billlist AT nycap DOT rr DOT com> |
CC: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: tclsh83.exe should be cygtclsh83.exe |
References: | <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 0 DOT 20030127112956 DOT 01136520 AT pop DOT nycap DOT rr DOT com> <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 0 DOT 20030127123246 DOT 03c275d0 AT pop DOT nycap DOT rr DOT com> |
William A. Hoffman wrote: > I recently ran setup, and one of the new packages, I think gdb, caused > a tclsh83.exe to be installed into /usr/bin. It would be nice if > this were a full working tclsh83.exe, but it is not. However, it conflicted > with the working tclsh83.exe I already had in my path. Shouldn't the > name of this by cygtclsh83.exe? No. Are you suggesting that all 508 of the .exe's in my /bin should really be named "cyg*.exe"? "cyglynx" "cygman" "cygless" just because they MIGHT conflict with a mingw or native version of less.exe or man.exe? If that is NOT what you are suggestion -- e.g. that only tclsh83 should be renamed -- why? Why is tclsh83 special? It's easy to avoid executable PATH conflicts -- just make sure the tclsh you want appears in the PATH before the one you don't like. End of problem. --Chuck P.S. Now, we *do* name all DLL's with a special 'cyg' prefix, but that is because DLLs are a much more complicated problem than EXEs (memory resident, etc etc) -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |