www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>Nope. Chris should apply the attached patch to binutils and re-release. >>>It's surprising we didn't catch this when gcc-3.x/gcc2-2.95 were >>>getting their shakedown this summer. Oh well. >>> >>>Also, Chris, you could take the opportunity of binutils-20021107-3 to >>>apply Egor's remaining patches... :-) >>> >> >>Oops. Previous patch still left a chunk of Egor's changes. New patch >>replaces. >> > > How about submitting the patch to the binutils mailing list? > I've no objections -- but the patch is a workaround for a cygwin-specific packaging decision (e.g. providing gcc-2.95.3 as "gcc-2" and renaming the runtime libs accordingly). Is that something that should go into the "real" binutils CVS, or should it be kept in the cygwin binutils package only? --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |