Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 6 Nov 2002 21:07:29 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Problem with function keys codes with vt100 emulation
Message-ID:	<20021107020729.GB6188@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20021106131511 DOT 0212e850 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20021106151936 DOT 01febb78 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20021106163952 DOT 02068e70 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<5.1.0.14.2.20021106163952.02068e70@pop3.cris.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.1i

On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 04:50:12PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
>The terminal emulation available under Cygwin is not programmable, so it's 
>up to the software to adapt to it, not vice versa.

I will note that it is very weird that F1 - F4 in cygwin are generating
the same sequences as up/down/left/right.  Something is messed up
somewhere, there.

It's probably a hysterical problem with whomever first wrote the cygwin
console handling.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -