Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<20020830204842.30237.qmail@web21002.mail.yahoo.com>
Date:	Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Nicholas Wourms <nwourms AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Processor time bug in fhandler_proc.cc
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<20020830203940.GA11782@redhat.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0

--- Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 01:06:53PM -0700, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> >
> >--- Chris January <ccj00 AT doc DOT ic DOT ac DOT uk> wrote:
> >> I will make a patch for this that will also solve the problem
> with
> >> the HERTZ 
> >> define.
> >> 
> >> Please let me re-iterate here:
> >> 
> >> Most of the /proc values DO NOT WORK ON WINDOWS 95/98/ME.
> >
> >Why not?
> 
> Because Windows 95/98/me suck.
> 

I do not dispute that.  However, I'm going to check into this...  It
seems to me that, given the many native apps that can monitor 9x/ME's
stats and processes, one might assume there is an interface for
accessing the information that /proc provides under NT/2K/XP.

Cheers,
Nicholas

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
http://finance.yahoo.com

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -