Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 30 Aug 2002 16:39:40 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Processor time bug in fhandler_proc.cc
Message-ID:	<20020830203940.GA11782@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<E17ko39-0002AF-00 AT duck DOT doc DOT ic DOT ac DOT uk> <20020830200653 DOT 14247 DOT qmail AT web21006 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20020830200653.14247.qmail@web21006.mail.yahoo.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 01:06:53PM -0700, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
>
>--- Chris January <ccj00 AT doc DOT ic DOT ac DOT uk> wrote:
>> I will make a patch for this that will also solve the problem with
>> the HERTZ 
>> define.
>> 
>> Please let me re-iterate here:
>> 
>> Most of the /proc values DO NOT WORK ON WINDOWS 95/98/ME.
>
>Why not?

Because Windows 95/98/me suck.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -