Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 16 Jul 2002 22:49:20 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Broken since 1.3.10, or earlier
Message-ID:	<20020717024920.GB24046@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20020717022743 DOT GA24046 AT redhat DOT com> <200207170245 DOT g6H2jGO28572 AT d-ip-129-15-78-125 DOT cs DOT ou DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<200207170245.g6H2jGO28572@d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 09:45:16PM -0500, Jon Cast wrote:
>Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> wrote:
><snip>
>>bash makes assumptions that pids grow monotonically but that is not the
>>case on windows.  It's possible that you can run a program twice and
>>get the same pid twice in a row -- especially on Windows 9x.  I try to
>>work around this in cygwin by keeping a certain number of process
>>handles open, so that the pids won't be reused, but that still causes
>>problems when you are fork/execing processes quickly.
>
>Just out of curiosity, why would bash care if pids grow monotonically?
>(I know I can check the sources, but I'm lazy.)

I assume that the bash developer is just mean.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -