www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-Originating-IP: | [210.84.178.197] |
Reply-To: | "Trevor Forbes" <t4bs AT hotmail DOT com> |
From: | "Trevor Forbes" <t4bs AT hotmail DOT com> |
To: | <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
References: | <E17QTq3-0004vt-0X AT anchor-post-33 DOT mail DOT demon DOT net> <004f01c22449$91da71a0$0100a8c0 AT advent02> <20020705200207 DOT GA11696 AT redhat DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: /proc/uptime etc. - NtQuerySystemInformation() needs bigger structure |
Date: | Sat, 6 Jul 2002 13:44:21 +0930 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 |
Message-ID: | <OE76UOF9vJZTuG5wQ0l000026a5@hotmail.com> |
X-OriginalArrivalTime: | 06 Jul 2002 04:14:32.0312 (UTC) FILETIME=[A13BDF80:01C224A3] |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com> > This is one thing that was fixed by the -fnative-struct gcc option which > is, unfortunately, not available in gcc 3.1. > Yes, but I thought that the -fnative-struct functionality moved to -mms-bitfields in gcc 3.1? Is this correct? Trevor -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |