Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/04/06/17:32:01
Hi Chris,
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 10:01:36PM -0600, Dave Trollope wrote:
> >Since it exists on Linux and Solaris, I figured that this was new to
> >Cygwin and its applications. The question is, for what was it
> >introduced to both Linux and Solaris, and shouldn't it be introduced to
> >Cygwin?
>
> That's rarely the question.
>
> The question is "Who's going to do the work to get it into Cygwin?"
>
That was my next question if the answer to the first was yes.
I would willingly create a patch myself, but I don't currently understand
what this error code is for, I was hoping someone would know.
> The way to get something into Cygwin is to send a patch.
>
> Hopefully, you'd implement both the errno and the code for detecting it,
> whereever it exists. Otherwise, as Corinna indicates, there is no
> reason for the errno. If some code is expecting it, without making it
> conditional, you could easily make a case that THAT code is in error
> since it's frightfully simple to check for this type of thing.
I agree, but since I don't know what it means it would be unwise to just
throw it in.
Dave
>
> cgf
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -