www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Message-ID: | <3C5D64A7.494AB6CD@lapo.it> |
Date: | Sun, 03 Feb 2002 17:26:15 +0100 |
From: | Lapo Luchini <lapo AT lapo DOT it> |
X-Mailer: | Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) |
X-Accept-Language: | it,en,fr,es,ja |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: /dev/registry |
References: | <014a01c1acc9$7324cc80$0100a8c0 AT advent02> |
> How about adding a /dev/registry fhandler to Cygwin? Registry keys would be > directories and values in the registry files. I'm willing to try coding this > if people think it's a good idea. It allows shell scripts to easily access > registry keys as well as programs. Seems good to me, but it seems better as a /proc/registry/(key/)*value (the first support of cygwin /proc ? would be cool to also add the ordinary stuff, processor type, memory.. and so on) -- Lapo 'Raist' Luchini lapo AT lapo DOT it (PGP & X.509 keys available) http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796) -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |