Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3BD5A07A.26390810@syntrex.com>
Date:	Tue, 23 Oct 2001 18:53:14 +0200
From:	Pavel Tsekov <ptsekov AT syntrex DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: 1.3.3-2: fseek fails on multiples of 1024 (binary mode)
References:	<20011021225629 DOT 17478 DOT qmail AT foolabs DOT com> <20011022150648 DOT B10383 AT redhat DOT com> <3BD556FE DOT 46350849 AT syntrex DOT com> <20011023141012 DOT G31068 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3BD59914 DOT 780FD423 AT syntrex DOT com> <20011023125049 DOT A22558 AT redhat DOT com>

Doh :) Sorry, I read your message after posting this one :(

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> Again, these observations should go to the mailing list which is
> responsible for maintaining the code that you've analyzed:
> newlib AT sources DOT redhat DOT com .
> 
> I've redirected this discussion there.
> 
> Thanks for your in-depth analysis of the problem.
> 
> cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -