www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Message-ID: | <2C08D4EECBDED41184BB00D0B74733420473EDB6@exchanger.cacheflow.com> |
From: | "Karr, David" <david DOT karr AT cacheflow DOT com> |
To: | "'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Subject: | Make: How to force a particular build order when using "-jN" |
Date: | Thu, 28 Jun 2001 08:45:34 -0700 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Mailer: | Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) |
When in the presence of "make -jN", and with the following example, I believe that the order of building "foo" and "bar" is indeterminate. ------------- all: foo bar foo: touch foo bar: touch bar ------------- However, is it the case that with this next example, that the order CAN be determined, and that "foo" would be built before "bar", even in the presence of "make -jN"? ------------- all:: foo all:: bar foo: touch foo bar: touch bar ------------- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |