Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-Id:	<5.1.0.14.2.20010627210139.027cd008@pop3.cris.com>
X-Sender:	rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com
X-Mailer:	QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date:	Wed, 27 Jun 2001 21:11:12 -0700
To:	"jorgens AT coho DOT net" <jorgens AT coho DOT net>,
	"Cygwin List (E-mail)" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
From:	Randall R Schulz <rrschulz AT cris DOT com>
Subject:	RE: cvs via Cygwin (W98) to FAT to Linux - permissions
In-Reply-To:	<01C0FF4B.689CCAF0.jorgens@coho.net>
Mime-Version:	1.0

Steve,

All I'm saying is what I read in the CVS manual. If you don't have it, I 
strongly recommend you procure one.

Are you using CVS via the pserver protocol, or via direct access? I have 
almost never used it directly, always via the pserver protocol.

Of course, under Cygwin, execute bits are "synthesized" from things like a 
.exe suffix or a #! header line.

Certainly under Linux, there has to be an applicable execute bit to get any 
file executed, whether it's a script or a binary. I'm pretty sure that 
applies to root, too.

Maybe you'll have to examine the source code after all, even if you decide 
to implement your needs outside the CVS command as I originally suggested. 
Some experiments might help clear things up.

Good luck.

Randall


At 20:54 2001-06-27, Steve Jorgensen wrote:
>So I'm a little confused (perpetually, it seems).  You're saying cvs never
>deals with the executable bit?  How is it that scripts I receive via cvs
>under Linux are executable by typing ./<scriptname>?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:   Randall R Schulz [SMTP:rrschulz AT cris DOT com]
>Sent:   Wednesday, June 27, 2001 8:39 PM
>To:     jorgens AT coho DOT net; cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
>Subject:        RE: cvs via Cygwin (W98) to FAT to Linux - permissions
>
>Steve,
>
>OK. Moving on from a shoot-from-the-hip suggestion, I checked out the CVS
>manual (and old one, admittedly--version 1.9).
>
>According to section 4.2.2, pg. 16, files in the working copy of the
>repository have permissions "typical for newly created files, except that
>sometimes CVS creates them read-only."
>
>I take this to mean that the CVS command creates the files with mode 0666
>(or 0444 in the read-only case) and that the prevailing umask value is used
>to pare them down from there.
>
>Thus, it seems you really have very little to do, in fact. The files are
>either (0666& ~umask) or (0444 & ~umask).
>
>For a FAT file system volume, then, the only distinction is whether or not
>the read-only attribute is set.
>
>I don't know the details, but probably cygwin1.dll already handles this?
>
>Randall


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -