www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
From: | "Soren Andersen" <soren AT wonderstorm DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Date: | Mon, 8 Jan 2001 08:37:03 -0500 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Subject: | Re: dev/null |
Reply-to: | soren AT wonderstorm DOT com |
Message-ID: | <3A597C2F.29181.362977A9@localhost> |
In-reply-to: | <20010107124950.A22232@redhat.com> |
X-mailer: | Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) |
On 7 Jan 2001, an entity purporting to be Christopher Faylor [Christopher Faylor <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>] wrote [regarding Re: dev/null] soren: >> But manually, I just use 'nul'. Chris: > /dev/null in cygwin eventually translates to the Windows NUL device. I figured. > There is no reason to use 'NUL' rather than '/dev/null' since they are > both the same thing ... unless you enjoy using MS-DOS constructs rather than > UNIX ones. That's sort of anti-Cygwin, though. NO! NO! I am not anti-Cygwin ;-). I LUV Cygwin. As a background general-knowledge sort of thing, I think its good to know this. Allegory ... if you were stranded on a desert island with no way to buy tiolet paper, would it be good to know how to make plant leaves very soft .. ? Someone might someday be working out a problem without Cygwin around. I don't WISH it on them, but it could happen. Cheers, soren -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |