www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Date: | Fri, 15 Dec 2000 15:15:46 -0500 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: _open problem using O_EXCL flag and -mno-cygwin |
Message-ID: | <20001215151546.C27176@redhat.com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <20001215192448 DOT 6817 DOT qmail AT web121 DOT yahoomail DOT com> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.3.11i |
In-Reply-To: | <20001215192448.6817.qmail@web121.yahoomail.com>; from earnie_boyd@yahoo.com on Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 11:24:47AM -0800 |
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 11:24:47AM -0800, Earnie Boyd wrote: >--- "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com> wrote: >> Since this sounds like a question about how the Mingw version (-mno-cygwin) >> of the compiler works, you should probably direct the question to that list >> (mingw-users AT lists DOT sourceforge DOT net). >> > >Wrong advice. -mno-cygwin is a Cygwin specific option. However, this has to >do with the mingw-runtime and could either be a problem with crtdll or the >definition of O_EXCL for the mingw-runtime headers. > >I'll look into this eventually. I don't understand your response. The person was reporting a problem with, essentially, a mingw appliation. Larry suggested that the question should go to the mingw-users mailing list. Why is this incorrect advice? I would have thought that it was possible that this kind of issue would be well-known to the users of that list. Certainly -mno-cygwin is an option to the Cygwin version of gcc but the resulting code should be nearly identical to a "native" mingw compiler. That puts this question into the realm of a mingw mailing list, IMO. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |