Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<001f01c05ea0$9f54ffa0$65308cd4@emerald>
From:	"Steven O'Brien" <steven_obrien AT lineone DOT net>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<001401c05df0$e4dd0c80$95698cd4 AT emerald> <3A2BB6BB DOT 4353B8D4 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Subject:	Re: building dlls, C and C++
Date:	Tue, 5 Dec 2000 09:47:28 -0000
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200

Thanks for the examples, Chuck. I think  I now understand why the ncurses++
dll fails to build corrrectly. The bug in egcs that Mumit refers to in the
c++ example appears to still exist in gcc-2.95.2. To build cygncurses++5.dll
and c++/demo.exe, the following mods are necessary:

1) the gcc bug - static *data* members do not pick up the "NCURSES_IMPEXP"
decoration correctly from the class declaration, so you have to add this
explicitly. (see dllclass.h in the dllhelpers pack  you attached for an
example) Files affected:
  c++/cursesapp.h
  c++/cursesf.h
  c++/cursesp.h
  c++/cursesw.h
  c++/cursslk.h

2) main() function - A correct main() for this example would be:
    int main() { return Demo(); }

3) remove the #defines in c++/etip.h.in that force definition of
NCURSES_STATIC

with these changes, then the instructions in ncurses-5.2-2-src.tar.gz
produce a working cygncurses++5.dll and c++/demo.exe

Steve

----- Original Message -----
From: Charles S. Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
To: Steven O'Brien <steven_obrien AT lineone DOT net>
Cc: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: building dlls, C and C++


> I don't see this problem.  Here's an example, cooked up from Mumit's
> outdated dllhelpers kit, but redone to fit the more recent ld/gcc
> combinations and their capabilities.
>
> --Chuck


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -