Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3A0B7DD7.B295D300@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Thu, 09 Nov 2000 23:47:19 -0500
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Re: Can not found crt1.o when using -mno-cygwin option
References:	<002101c04a1d$60ae0c20$de90718c AT cm DOT nctu DOT edu DOT tw> <3A0AE178 DOT 7FF31F35 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20001109232939 DOT A6759 AT redhat DOT com>

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 12:40:08PM -0500, Charles S. Wilson wrote:
> >There seem to be a few mistakes in the specs file; the following seems
> >to work (however, the "right" fix is somewhere in the bowels of the gcc
> >source code, so that the specs file is *generated* to look like this).
> >
> >#1) The specs file is using the wrong version number
> 
> I don't know how this matters.  This version isn't reported by gcc and
> it obviously isn't used for getting the specs file.  I have, however,
> updated my script to deal with this.  The problem is that the specs file
> is generated by the compiler building gcc rather than gcc itself when
> building gcc as a cross-compile.  That's what I do.

It probably doesn't matter.  I just noticed it because "gcc -v" showed
"version 2.95.2-3" and I knew that was wrong.  Then, I saw it in the
spec file while tracking down the libmingw thing.

--Chuck

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -