Mail Archives: cygwin/2000/10/30/23:14:50
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I can produce a tarball easily. I've been messing with diff/patch
but I'm receiving crashes from patch.exe.
I'm also not sure about the licensing scheme for kerberos. I
believe there are export restrictions etc that would make it's inclusion
in the standard distro illegal in some circumstances.
As for being the maintainer... I'm not sure. I ported this so I
could use it and the port was relatively easy. If some obscure bug pops
up I don't think I can go trhough the 100,000+ lines of code to fix it.
I'll try to post instructions and a patch as soon as I can figure
out why patch is crashing on me.
Thanks,
Mark
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 05:15:51PM -0800, Mark Seigle wrote:
> > I'm new to this list, but I figured that some people might like the
> >most up-to-date version of MIT kerberos.
> >
> > I'm not sure what the protocol is for posting patches etc. Please
> >clue me in.
>
> If you would like to produce a tarball with this stuff, we can include
> it in the standard distribution, assuming that you're willing to be
> responsive to problems that crop up here.
>
> For kerberos, I think that this just means that things are installed
> by default in /usr/kerberos/...
>
> Are you interested in being the cygwin kerberos maintainer?
>
> cgf
>
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
>
>
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
- Raw text -