www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2000/10/28/14:57:12

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <39FB216E.347DE647@ece.gatech.edu>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 14:56:46 -0400
From: "Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject: Re: So, has anyone *tried* the new gcc test release?
References: <20001028000646 DOT A25472 AT redhat DOT com>


Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> Has anyone tried this?
> 
> In case it isn't clear, you just have to choose the test version of gcc
> when running setup.exe.
> 
> The only change in this release is DJ's change to eat ^M's in every case
> in cpp.

I was not affected by the original problem, but I have succesfully built
some stuff with the new gcc.  At least, the new gcc doesn't seem to have
broken anything...

--Chuck

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019