Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Thu, 14 Sep 2000 13:40:37 +0100
Message-ID:	<8312-Thu14Sep2000134037+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>
X-Mailer:	emacs 20.7.1 (via feedmail 9-beta-7 I);
	VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.7.1
From:	David Starks-Browning <starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Re: chmod does not work as expected
In-Reply-To:	<20000902222215.C13854@cygnus.com>
References:	<20000902230156 DOT CHCZ24872 DOT mta01 DOT onebox DOT com AT onebox DOT com>
	<p04320400b5d73cc8a676@[206.173.234.217]>
	<20000902222215 DOT C13854 AT cygnus DOT com>

Some time ago Chris wrote to me requesting a FAQ entry:

On Saturday 2 Sep 00, Chris Faylor writes:
> FAQ alert.
> 
> We need something that discusses why "chmod doesn't work" along with
> some discussion of ntsec and ntea.

Along with this "answer":

> ntsec will allow UNIX perms on Windows NT on NTFS file systems.
> 
> ntea works on NTFS and FAT but it creates a huge (undeletable) file on
> FAT filesystems.
> 
> There is no solution at all for Windows 9x.

Is this enough?  Does this answer the question completely?  If not,
could someone contribute a more thorough explanation?

I don't use ntsec myself, so I don't know what the issues or
limitations are.

Thanks for your help.

Cheers,
David


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -