Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Originating-IP:	[212.54.79.25]
From:	"Jonas Jensen" <bones0_list AT hotmail DOT com>
To:	"Cygwin List" <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	printf is faster when piped through tee
Date:	Sat, 2 Sep 2000 16:11:08 +0200
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Message-ID:	<OE9jWwY0VnkB4ltFlmm000000a8@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	02 Sep 2000 14:11:25.0210 (UTC) FILETIME=[ADCA6FA0:01C014E7]

Something's wrong with the performance of printf. When compiling with gcc,
printf executes much slower than with Microsoft's "cl". The funny thing is
that when I pipe those programs through "tee", they're both (equally) fast.

This is my test program:
------------------------------------------------
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

void main(int argc, char** argv)
{
   register int i;
   if (argc != 2) return 1;
   i = atoi(argv[1]);
   while (i--)
      printf("%i bottles of beer on the wall...\n", i);
}
------------------------------------------------

Here are the scores of 1000 loops through this program, in seconds, measured
with the "time" keyword in bash.

cl: 0.561
gcc: 10.055
gcc/tee: 0.861
cl/tee 0.861

It appears that there's a way to print faster, because "cat" has no problem,
while "ls" and others suffer badly from it.
Can anyone explain/fix this?

I'm using Win2k, Cygwin 1.1.4.

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -