www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
From: | Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com> |
Date: | Wed, 26 Jul 2000 16:48:27 -0400 |
To: | cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Subject: | Re: setup + cygcheck |
Message-ID: | <20000726164827.A1436@cygnus.com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
References: | <397F4BE0 DOT DCDD9E52 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.2i |
In-Reply-To: | <397F4BE0.DCDD9E52@ece.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 04:36:48PM -0400 |
On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 04:36:48PM -0400, Charles S. Wilson wrote: >When I run 'cygcheck -s -v -r' (as adminstrator), part of the output >contains: > >HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Cygnus Solutions\Cygwin\Installed >Components\d:/cygwin >.... > binutils = 20000625 > gcc = 0002.0095.0002.0002 > cygwin = 0001.0001.0001 >.... > >among other items. > >These answers are not correct. /etc/setup/installed.db shows: > >binutils binutils-20000722-1.tar.gz 3370561 >gcc gcc-2.95.2-2.tar.gz 6172267 >cygwin cygwin-1.1.3.tar.gz 1331394 > >(ok, gcc is correct). > >Three things: > >#1) should cygcheck be updated to show the new setup database in >/etc/setup/installed.db, instead of the old database in HKLM? Yes. >#2) should setup (the new one) remove the old database from HKLM? Yes. >#3) shouldn't cygcheck show the installed program info regardless of >whether you're running as Administrator or not? I don't understand this one. cygcheck currently does this as a side effect of its prior use of the registry (which was one of the reasons that I used the registry) and it would do this if it dumped the installed.db info. How does administrator access enter into this? cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |