Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID:	<39496A88.A9531612@carlthompson.net>
Date:	Thu, 15 Jun 2000 16:45:12 -0700
From:	Carl Thompson <cet AT carlthompson DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Cc:	Cygwin List <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Can't build a DLL using gcc
References:	<852568FF DOT 007476F8 DOT 00 AT D51MTA04 DOT pok DOT ibm DOT com> <39495C96 DOT D14912FA AT carlthompson DOT net> <39496405 DOT 2B9FD3A AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>

Charles Wilson wrote:

> ...

> You probably *should* use def files if (a) you're developing a library
> that other folks might want to use, without recompiling their
> application code, and (b) you want to support those apps that
> 'import-by-number' from the dll. With the no-def-file method, you're
> never guaranteed that the name/numbers will be the same from build to
> build.

I understand what you are saying, but if developers are using my headers and
my import library to link with my DLL, wouldn't they always be importing by
name?  I don't know anything about the import by number method.  Why is it
ever used?  How is it used?  More info, please...

Anyway, I hope at least the information in my message about the alternate
way to build DLLs helped you.

> --Chuck

Carl Thompson

> ...

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -