Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning:	hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu: khan owned process doing -bs
Date:	Sat, 29 Jan 2000 13:46:24 -0600 (CST)
From:	Mumit Khan <khan AT NanoTech DOT Wisc DOT EDU>
To:	N8TM AT aol DOT com
cc:	kris DOT thielemans AT csc DOT mrc DOT ac DOT uk, anorland AT hem DOT passagen DOT se,
	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: LARGE_INTEGER in w32API 0.1.5
In-Reply-To:	<5b.1341403.25c2f83d@aol.com>
Message-ID:	<Pine.HPP.3.96.1000129134410.25597O-100000@hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu>
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Fri, 28 Jan 2000 N8TM AT aol DOT com wrote:

> When this has been sorted out, the gcc distribution of 
> libf2c/libU77/[de]time_.c needs the corresponding fix.  Will there be 3 
> commonly distributed variations in LARGE_INTEGER?
> 

My local tree has the fix. The next w32api snapshot from my site will
default to _ANONYMOUS_UNION and _ANONYMOUS_STRUCT and unfortunately that
will create a few transient problems. But we need to look at the future,
and do it right before it's too late (ie., before it breaks too many 
code that uses the .u hack for lack of anon struct/union support).

Note that my recent changes to w32api (will be in the snapshot this
weekend and hopefully in Cygwin's next net release) will only turn on
this feature if the compiler supports it.

Regards,
Mumit



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -