www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/1999/12/15/20:00:25

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning: hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu: khan owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 18:59:56 -0600 (CST)
From: Mumit Khan <khan AT NanoTech DOT Wisc DOT EDU>
To: Norman Vine <nhv AT yahoo DOT com>
cc: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject: Re: 'new' broken in 2-95.2
In-Reply-To: <19991215205946.15682.qmail@web116.yahoomail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.HPP.3.96.991215185609.19173B-100000@hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0

On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Norman Vine wrote:

> The last couple of times I have installed cygnus
> with gcc-2.95.2 I have gotten this troubling
> error
> 
> /c/CYGNUS/CYGWIN~1/H-I586~1/BIN/../lib/gcc-lib/i586-cygwin32/2.95.2/include/new.
> h:6: new: Permission denied
> 
> It is easily solved ( hacked ) by changing
> c:\cygnus\cygwin-b20\H-i586-cygwin32\lib\gcc-lib\i586-cygwin32\2.95.2\include\new.h
> line 6
> //#include <new>
> #include "new"
> 
> but I am wondering what else is broken that I am not
> seeing ??
> 
> This is with a fresh install of
> b20.1 full.exe
> cygwin-inst-19991201.tar.gz
> cygwin1-19991205.dll.gz
> binutils-2.9.4-cygb20.tar.gz
> gcc-2.95.2-cygb20.tar.gz
> gcc-2.95.2-dev-ss.tar.gz
> in that order

The dev snapshots are for developers, and unless you're willing to
switch back and forth and find a stable one, you're on your own.
This is the usual caveat on using the nightly snapshots, which come
without *any* guarantee that it will even run!

Using terms like "gcc 2.95.2 is broken" in this case is not just unfair, 
it's grossly incorrect. 

Regards,
Mumit



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019