| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
On Sun, Dec 05, 1999 at 11:21:18AM -0500, N8TM AT aol DOT com wrote: >In a message dated 12/5/99 7:59:52 AM Pacific Standard Time, jvalen AT rdc DOT cl >writes: >> gcc -Iy:\include,y:\H-i586-cygwin32\i586-cygwin32\include y.tab.o >> lex.yy.o adventM.o actionsM.o particM.o -Lfl -o advent > >Does this work the same as > >gcc -L//y/include -L//y/H-i586-cygwin32/i586-cygwin32/include \ > lex.yy.o adventM.o actionsM.o particM.o -lfl -o advent > >? > >Yes, -lfl should take care of linking libfl. I'm confused about how >many DOSish variations cygwin may permit; I like to stick with trying >to learn what should work both in cygwin and linux. It's not a question of cygwin permitting things. The issue is whether the individual application attempts to parse UNIX paths. If it does, then it will invariably be confused by x:\foo paths. There is really no reason to be confused. Don't use the DOS paths and you should have very few problems. That's why we invented Cygwin. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |