Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Date:	Mon, 11 Oct 1999 23:57:37 -0400
From:	Cygwin Mailing List <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
To:	"J. J. Farrell" <jjf AT bcs DOT org DOT uk>
Cc:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: Available soon -- Cygwin on a CD
Message-ID:	<19991011235737.A8255@cygnus.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	"J. J. Farrell" <jjf AT bcs DOT org DOT uk>,
	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
References:	<19991011171011 DOT A2249 AT cygnus DOT com> <199910120055 DOT RAA29688 AT aleph DOT ssd DOT hal DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Mutt 0.95.6i
In-Reply-To:	<199910120055.RAA29688@aleph.ssd.hal.com>; from J. J. Farrell on Mon, Oct 11, 1999 at 05:55:05PM -0700

On Mon, Oct 11, 1999 at 05:55:05PM -0700, J. J. Farrell wrote:
>> From: Christopher Faylor <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
>> 
>> Thanks to your support and feedback, I am pleased to announce the
>> commercial availability of Cygwin 1.0.  ...
>> 
>> We are calling this version of Cygwin version 1.0 but it is essentially
>> B21.  ...
>
>Good stuff, but I'm a bit confused about how various things relate.
>
>1) Does this mean that there will be no more net releases?

No.

>2) I might not be reading it thoroughly enough, but it looks to me
>   from the Web page that everything on the CD is GPL or similar.
>   I assume this means that someone could buy the CD and copy the
>   whole thing to a website for free download. Is this correct?
>   (I'm not suggesting that anyone would, and certainly not that
>   they should - just trying to understand the release model.)

The software is all open source, yes.  The installer is not open source.

>3) I gather this has the same relationship to the GNUPro release
>   (what I've always thought of previously as "the commercial
>   release") that the net releases have - basically that you can
>   only generate Open Source products with this CD and if you
>   want to use the same(ish) tools to generate a 'traditional'
>   software product, you have to pay for the GNUPro release.
>   I'm sure this is correct, but I'd got confused by this being
>   described as a commercial release - or am I still confused?

Please go to the referenced web site and read the FAQ.

-chris

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -