| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
"Chris Telting" <telting AT sprynet DOT com> writes: > > > That's all that's needed? It only requires a keyword and code to generate > the fastcalls which is minimal. Even I can do that. If that's what's > needed then > I volunteer to do it myself. I also know as a fact that the linker needs to > be > changed. I had an implementation of fastcall a long time ago, but never added it since nobody asked for it. I can dig it out and send it to you if you want to play with it. It requires a change to the backend to handle the special calling convention (from what I remember, it was a cross between regparm and stdcall), but as far as I can tell, no change to linker necessary. Could you please explain why you think the linker needs to be changed to support it? > There actually needs to be a flag set in the pe header in order for it to be > a > valid but again that's minimal. Please elaborate why fastcall requires PE header flag change. I'm going through the MSDN docs right now, but that always takes a while. Pointers welcome. Regards, Mumit -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |