Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Sender:	root AT pluto DOT ipass DOT net
Message-ID:	<374A0077.1DB1B476@ipass.net>
Date:	Mon, 24 May 1999 21:44:23 -0400
From:	"Suhaib M. Siddiqi" <ssiddiqi AT ipass DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.5-15 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Randall Schulz <rschulz AT Teknowledge DOT COM>
CC:	Mark Peterson <mark_h_peterson AT yahoo DOT com>, cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: /bin mount point and sh.exe
References:	<19990525005219 DOT 20273 DOT rocketmail AT web116 DOT yahoomail DOT com> <4 DOT 1 DOT 19990524181411 DOT 00d9eb90 AT mailhost DOT teknowledge DOT com>

Randall Schulz wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Suhaib's response is correct. But to expound, let me point out a few other
> pertinent facts:
> 
> This command (whether invoked from sh, BASH or a "DOS" prompt):
> 
>         sh command
> 
> is a request to have sh open the file "command" and interpret it as a
> script of shell commands. It will do this regardless of whether or not the
> file named "command" has a suitable execute bit set. Under Linux, sh does
> PATH searching in this case. Under cygwin it apparently does not. In this
> case, arguments following "command" will be presented to the "command"
> script (assuming it is one) as $1, $2, etc. shell script parameters.
> 
> This one:
> 
>         sh -c "command argument-to-command"


These are the porting issues.  Often if you want to execute a script
from
a DOS prompt you need to do this.

> 
> requests sh to interpret the string given as an argument to the "-c" option
> as a command, pretty much as if you'd typed it to an interactive instance
> of "sh." In this case "command" must have an execute bit set.
> 
> One last (interesting) thing to note: Under cygwin, a file will display
> execute bits if it begins with "#!". I suppose this is one reason why "ls
> -l" is so much slower under cygwin (at least the first time--before the
> disk cache is primed with the files' contents) than a "details" listing
> under Windows Explorer.
> 
> Randy Schulz
> Teknowledge Corp.
> Palo Alto, CA USA
> 
> At 06:04 PM 5/24/99 , Suhaib M. Siddiqi wrote:
> >Mark Peterson wrote:
> >>
> >> I have chosen the "identity mount" setup and mounted
> >

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -