Mail Archives: cygwin/1999/01/21/01:42:22
Yes for your first comment.
Second, i was thanking him. He deserves many more thanks for his
friendly and detailed answers whenever I wrote to him.
And by the way thanks to you to for this kind of e-mail.
Suhaib
Original Message -----
From: Craig Burley <burley AT gnu DOT org>
To: <Ssiddiqi AT InspirePharm DOT Com>
Cc: <khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu>; <d DOT love AT dl DOT ac DOT uk>; <ssiddiqi AT ipass DOT net>;
<gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com>; <egcs-bugs AT cygnus DOT com>; <burley AT gnu DOT org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 1999 1:50 PM
Subject: Re: G77 fork problems
>>Actually G77 way of handeling FORK makes more sense to
>>me -- personally.
>
>Could you elaborate? I thought Mumit had explained g77 *doesn't*
provide
>a wrapper for fork(). Do you mean you prefer the interface Mumit
>provided in his (sample) wrapper? If so, he's the one to thank, not
>g77!
>
> tq vm, (burley)
>-
>For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message
to
>"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".
>
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".
- Raw text -