From:	newsham AT lava DOT net (Tim Newsham)
Subject:	fork + dlls
20 Aug 1998 11:55:54 -0700 :
Message-ID:	<m0z9Gp9-0010zOC.cygnus.gnu-win32@malasada.lava.net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com

Hi,

    When you manually load a dll, and then perform a fork, the dll
is not accessible from the child process.  When you think about what
is going on here, it makes sense.  My question though is, is this the
way fork should behave?  Or should (could) the fork code reload the
dll in the child process after a fork?  It seems that this would 
more closely follow the expected fork semantics.

Opinions?

                                            Tim N.

-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".

- Raw text -