Mail Archives: cygwin/1998/06/03/06:16:11
> Colin Peters (colin AT fu DOT is DOT saga-u DOT ac DOT jp)
> Tue, 2 Jun 1998 19:51:18 +0900
>
>vtailor AT gte DOT net wrote:
>>The reason that the PrintDlg() call fails under __WIN32__ is that
>>sizeof(PRINTDLG) == 68, but the operating system gives an error
>>message unless you set the pd.lStructSize member to 66. This, of
>>course, doesn't happen in the 16-bit Windows 3.x version. Once
>>you get the PrintDlg() call to work, you then discover that all
>>succeeding calls to Escape and TextOut succeed, but the program
>>still fails to print. Oh yes, Borland C++ Builder for Windows 95
>>gives similar results, and substituting more modern calls doesn't
>>seem to make any difference.
>
>The sizeof(PRINTDLG) will give 66 if you modify the Win32 headers to make
>the PRINTDLG structure
>packed. I did this by changing the line of Windows32/Structures.h
>
>} PRINTDLG, *LPPRINTDLG;
>
>To
>
>} PACKED;
>
>typedef struct tagPD PRINTDLG, *LPPRINTDLG;
>
>Where I had earlier defined PACKED to be __attribute__((packed)) in
>Windows32/Defines.h
>
>Perhaps this will fix the problem?
>
I tried what you suggested, and the call to PrintDlg() succeeded. Then,
all subsequent calls to TextOut and Escape also succeeded, but 32-bit
printing failed. That brings MINGW32 up to par with Borland Builder C++.
Somewhere in the Microsoft Windows 32 helpfile, there is a statement about
compiling these printer calls for Windows 95 with sizeof(int) == 2. That
may be the key to the problem, since the 16-bit code works like a charm.
How exactly does one go about setting sizeof(int) == 2 in a Windows 95
compiler, I wonder?
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".
- Raw text -